The Flint Blame Game

Who is “really” responsible for this once-proud city’s awful predicament?

For the past few weeks, liberals have sought to blame Republican governor Rick Snyder for the lead contamination plaguing Flint, Michigan’s municipal water supply. In office since 2011, Snyder has publicly expressed concern, declared an emergency, activated the National Guard to help distribute bottled water, filters, and test kits, and asked the state legislature for $28 million in emergency funding to address the situation. But some on the left are demanding a villain, and ritual vilification. Thus, in her closing statement at the last presidential debate, Hillary Clinton expressed outrage (and urged “every single American” to be similarly outraged) at Snyder’s supposed indifference to the plight of Flint residents, even suggesting, risibly, that the governor would have handled the matter differently if the residents were affluent and white instead of “poor in many ways and majority African-American.” Bernie Sanders went further and called on Snyder to resign.

This is nonsense, and all the caterwauling is simply the Left’s standard narrative in matters of municipal mismanagement. The essential facts are undisputed. While waiting for a new, long-planned pipeline to Lake Huron to be completed, in 2014 Flint began using the Flint River—previously used for short periods as a backup—as the primary water source for city residents. Though the river water itself was not tainted, without proper treatment it was corrosive enough to leach lead and other heavy metals from Flint’s aging pipes, which caused residents to be exposed to high lead levels. Remarkably, this contamination went undetected for 18 months. Some children in Flint exposed during that time have tested positive for lead, a potent neurotoxin. The city has now switched back to the previous (safe) water source, and state officials are conducting testing and distributing filters, but beleaguered Flint residents understandably remain alarmed—and uncertain of who to blame.

Read More at City Journal

  • “Mark Pulliam is one of the few truly fearless, devastatingly incisive, original and yet deeply learned commentators on the contemporary legal scene.  His new blog is a welcome addition and a splendid and provocative resource.”
    Professor Stephen B. Presser
    Raoul Berger Professor of Legal History Emeritus, Northwestern University School of Law
  • “Mark Pulliam is the Walt Longmire of legal conservatism. You don't want to be on the wrong end of his pen. His commentary on law, politics, and policy is not to be missed.”
    Richard Reinsch II
    Director of Law and Liberty, Liberty Fund, Inc.
  • “Mark's blistering criticism of the foibles of the lawyering class and crackpot judges is a worthy penance for a recovering attorney. And it is our gain.”
    Michael Thompson
    Shareholder, Wright & Greenhill, P.C.
  • “Maybe this man’s degree is written in crayon."
    StupidEvilBastard.com
    StupidEvilBastard.com
  • "Mark Pulliam fancies himself a Paul Revere of the right."
    Froma Harrop
    Syndicated columnist
  • "Mark Pulliam is a good fellow….99 percent of the time, I love his material."
    William J. Watkins
    Research Fellow at the Independent Institute
  • “With the flourish of a pen, Mark Pulliam makes bad guys rhetorically bleed and weak guys physically cringe. It's awesome.”
    Michael Quinn Sullivan
    President & CEO, Empower Texans
  • "Mark Pulliam, writer and thinker extraordinaire, has a new blog. Make sure to visit and register. Mark Pulliam's new blog is a thing of wit and intelligence."
    Bradley J. Birzer
    Professor of History, Hillsdale College, President of the American Ideas Institute, and editor at large of The Imaginative Conservative
Featured In

Sign up for updates

Get the latest updates, news, and alerts directly from the source.
We promise, we don't spam.

Featured Tweets